LFGD — Looking Forward Giro Dolcet
M&A

Due Diligence and Acquisition of a Boutique Hotel Chain

Protecting the buyer from an inflated valuation and hidden liabilities that would have turned a good investment into a problem.

2022
7 months
M&A · Balearic Islands
−19%
REDUCTION ON PRICE
€480K
HIDDEN LIABILITY AVOIDED
4 assets
HOTELS ACQUIRED

THE CHALLENGE

The client had independently identified an opportunity that seemed attractive: a chain of four boutique hotels in Mallorca, all in prime locations, with a recognised brand in the lifestyle segment and an average occupancy of 78%. The seller was asking €18.5M and the client was prepared to pay that price without further analysis.

LFGD was engaged to conduct full due diligence before closing the transaction. What we found completely changed the picture. The seller's valuation was based on revenue projections that included two atypically strong post-pandemic seasons, without adjusting for market normalisation. Normalised EBITDA was 22% lower than presented.

Even more concerning was the discovery of three significant tax contingencies: an open tax inspection covering fiscal years 2019–2021, an employment dispute with former employees estimated at €180,000, and a debt to a strategic supplier that did not appear on the balance sheet but that the seller had verbally acknowledged in one of the negotiation meetings.

THE SOLUTION

The due diligence was structured across three simultaneous areas. In the financial area, we reconstructed the profit and loss account for the last five years, eliminating extraordinary effects and normalising revenues. We analysed real RevPAR against comparable market benchmarks and projected three scenarios for the next five years.

In the legal area, we worked with a firm specialising in hotel law to review all lease agreements (two of the four hotels operated under lease), operating licences, employment contracts and social security status. It was in this phase that the three tax contingencies were identified.

In the operational area, we visited all four properties, interviewed the management team and analysed online reviews for the last three years to assess the chain's real reputation. We also identified operational improvement opportunities that the buyer could implement to increase EBITDA by 15% in the first 24 months.

With all this information, we negotiated a price reduction from €18.5M to €15M, including price adjustment clauses linked to the resolution of the tax contingencies and an 8% price escrow held for 18 months as a guarantee against additional hidden liabilities.

THE RESULTS

The transaction closed at €15M, 19% below the initial price requested by the seller. The three tax contingencies identified during due diligence were quantified at €480,000 in potential liability, covered by the adjustment clauses and escrow negotiated.

Twelve months after closing, the client had implemented the operational improvement plan identified during due diligence. Average occupancy had risen from 78% to 84% and first-year EBITDA exceeded the base scenario projections by 11%.

The tax inspection was resolved with a settlement of €95,000, well below the maximum estimate of €300,000 we had provisioned. The employment dispute was resolved out of court for €62,000. The client recovered the escrow with a net positive balance.

KEY LEARNINGS

  • Due diligence is not a bureaucratic formality: it is the difference between a good investment and a problem. In this case, the direct saving was €3.5M plus €480K in avoided liabilities.

  • Seller projections must always be normalised. Atypical years — positive or negative — distort valuations and must be adjusted with rigour.

  • Hidden contingencies are more common than they appear. The key is not only to identify them, but to quantify them and transfer them to the price or contract terms.

PROJECT METRICS

€18.5M → €15M
Negotiated price
19% reduction on the initial price requested by the seller
€480K
Hidden liability identified
Tax and employment contingencies detected in due diligence
−22%
Normalised EBITDA
Real EBITDA was 22% lower than presented by the seller
8%
Escrow held
Of total price held as guarantee against additional liabilities
+11%
EBITDA year 1 vs. projection
First year exceeded the base scenario of the operational improvement plan
84%
Occupancy year 1
Versus 78% average occupancy at the time of acquisition

SIMILAR SITUATION?

Let's talk about how we can apply this experience to your specific case.

WORK PROCESS

1

Initial Review and DD Scope

2 weeks

Analysis of preliminary documentation provided by the seller. Definition of due diligence scope and formation of the multidisciplinary team.

2

Financial Due Diligence

4 weeks

Reconstruction of normalised profit and loss account. RevPAR, occupancy and market comparables analysis. Financial projections in three scenarios.

3

Legal and Tax Due Diligence

4 weeks

Review of contracts, licences, employment and tax status. Identification of the three hidden contingencies. Risk quantification.

4

Operational Due Diligence

2 weeks

Visits to all four properties. Management interviews. Online reputation analysis. Identification of improvement opportunities.

5

Negotiation and Structuring

3 weeks

Presentation of findings to the seller. Price and terms negotiation. Drafting of adjustment clauses and escrow.

6

Closing and Follow-up

2 weeks + 18 months

Signing of the purchase agreement. Support during the handover process. Monitoring of contingency resolution.